PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YFSIX vs. FLCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YFSIX vs. FLCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YFSIX achieves a 22.44% return, which is significantly lower than FLCKX's 27.04% return.


YFSIX

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
22.44%
6M
24.75%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*

FLCKX

1D
1.44%
1M
9.27%
YTD
27.04%
6M
25.37%
1Y
44.85%
3Y*
29.90%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
16.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YFSIX vs. FLCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
22.44%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%
FLCKX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K
27.04%20.45%27.06%26.21%-22.91%26.19%26.85%35.76%-16.34%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between YFSIX and FLCKX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between YFSIX and FLCKX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YFSIX vs. FLCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCKX
FLCKX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FLCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YFSIX vs. FLCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YFSIXFLCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.59

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

13.05

-8.20

YFSIX vs. FLCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the FLCKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YFSIX and FLCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YFSIX vs. FLCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YFSIX drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum FLCKX drawdown of -69.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YFSIX and FLCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YFSIXFLCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-69.99%

+34.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-13.03%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-28.52%

+14.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-28.52%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.53%

0.00%

-4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-12.39%

+7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

3.57%

+0.97%

Volatility

YFSIX vs. FLCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) is 6.69%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that YFSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YFSIXFLCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

9.06%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.43%

18.28%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.93%

22.29%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

23.09%

-7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

23.52%

-7.22%

YFSIX vs. FLCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YFSIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

YFSIX vs. FLCKX - Dividend Comparison

YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCKX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K
3.69%4.69%14.54%12.22%18.51%8.45%0.19%0.14%19.95%18.97%27.57%6.18%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YFSIX and FLCKX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCKX has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to YFSIX (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YFSIX dropped -35.10% vs FLCKX's -69.99%.

FLCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YFSIX and FLCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer