YETH vs. PLTW
YETH (Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YETH returned -38.22% vs -24.11% for PLTW. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.
Performance
YETH vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YETH achieves a -30.67% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -33.03% return.
YETH
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- 6M
- -35.22%
- YTD
- -30.67%
- 1Y
- -38.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- -29.69%
- YTD
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- -24.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YETH vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | -30.67% | -22.87% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -33.03% | 28.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between YETH and PLTW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YETH vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
YETH
PLTW
YETH vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YETH | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.98 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.42 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -0.81 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YETH vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YETH drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YETH and PLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YETH | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -57.27% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.73% | -57.27% | -1.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.64% | -45.22% | -12.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -24.54% | -8.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.18% | 29.98% | +6.20% |
Volatility
YETH vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) is 10.29%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 18.77%. This indicates that YETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YETH | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 18.77% | -8.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.13% | 48.05% | -7.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.70% | 61.69% | -3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.19% | 73.72% | -18.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.19% | 73.72% | -18.53% |
YETH vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
YETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
YETH vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
YETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.09%, less than PLTW's 128.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 128.77% | 72.40% | 0.00% |
YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF | 127.09% | 109.12% | 20.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YETH and PLTW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTW has higher volatility (18.77%) compared to YETH (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YETH dropped -64.41% vs PLTW's -57.27%.
On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -24.11% vs -38.22% for YETH. On fees, YETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YETH has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -24.11% return vs -38.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 128.77%, compared with 127.09% for YETH.
Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YETH and 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YETH and PLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer