PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YETH vs. PLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YETH vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YETH achieves a -30.67% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -33.03% return.


YETH

1D
-0.23%
1M
6.71%
6M
-35.22%
YTD
-30.67%
1Y
-38.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTW

1D
-1.98%
1M
0.97%
6M
-29.69%
YTD
-33.03%
1Y
-24.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YETH vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YETH
Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF
-30.67%-22.87%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-33.03%28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between YETH and PLTW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YETH vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YETH
YETH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
YETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
YETH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
YETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
YETH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YETH vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YETHPLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.98

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

-0.42

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

-0.81

-0.25

YETH vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YETH and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YETH vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YETH drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YETH and PLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YETHPLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-57.27%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.73%

-57.27%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.64%

-45.22%

-12.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-24.54%

-8.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.18%

29.98%

+6.20%

Volatility

YETH vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF (YETH) is 10.29%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 18.77%. This indicates that YETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YETHPLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

18.77%

-8.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.13%

48.05%

-7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.70%

61.69%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.19%

73.72%

-18.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.19%

73.72%

-18.53%

YETH vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

YETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YETH vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

YETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.09%, less than PLTW's 128.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
128.77%72.40%0.00%
YETH
Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF
127.09%109.12%20.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


YETH and PLTW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (18.77%) compared to YETH (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YETH dropped -64.41% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -24.11% vs -38.22% for YETH. On fees, YETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YETH has been the lower-risk option at 10.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -24.11% return vs -38.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 128.77%, compared with 127.09% for YETH.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YETH and 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YETH and PLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer