PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YDEC vs. XBAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YDEC vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YDEC vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
YDEC
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December
1.22%16.04%-0.79%14.33%-6.37%1.64%
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
1.92%13.38%11.55%20.53%-7.59%7.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YDEC achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 1.92% return.


YDEC

1D
0.80%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
1.22%
6M
3.09%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*

XBAP

1D
0.68%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.92%
6M
4.03%
1Y
12.49%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YDEC vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

YDEC has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YDEC vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YDEC
YDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
YDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
YDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
YDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YDEC vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YDECXBAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

1.88

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.56

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.37

10.47

-2.10

YDEC vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the XBAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YDEC and XBAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YDECXBAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.91

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between YDEC and XBAP is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

YDEC vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither YDEC nor XBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

YDEC vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YDEC drawdown since its inception was -23.34%, which is greater than XBAP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YDEC and XBAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YDECXBAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-14.57%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

-8.25%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

0.00%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-1.80%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.23%

+0.18%

Volatility

YDEC vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – December (YDEC) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) at 0.82%. This indicates that YDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YDECXBAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

0.82%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

1.87%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

10.09%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.20%

9.99%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.06%

9.99%

+1.07%