PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YCS vs. LCSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YCS vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's 0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, YCS has outperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 13.01%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.61% annualized return.


YCS

1D
0.16%
1M
1.99%
6M
9.13%
YTD
11.53%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
24.23%
10Y*
13.01%
ALL TIME*
6.68%

LCSIX

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.14%
6M
1.88%
YTD
0.58%
1Y
-0.89%
3Y*
-2.04%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
2.61%
ALL TIME*
3.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YCS vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
11.53%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
0.58%1.13%-8.29%-3.07%6.04%14.90%9.90%-5.97%15.16%6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between YCS and LCSIX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YCS vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LCSIX
LCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
LCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YCS vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YCSLCSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.99

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

-0.11

+3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

-0.25

+11.07

YCS vs. LCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the LCSIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCS and LCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YCS vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, which is greater than LCSIX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and LCSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YCSLCSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.56%

-25.13%

-24.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-4.97%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

-11.60%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

-13.21%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

-13.54%

-13.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.70%

+10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.79%

-6.40%

-13.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.23%

+0.39%

Volatility

YCS vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 1.36%. This indicates that YCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YCSLCSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.36%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

4.70%

+7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

5.91%

+10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.08%

5.51%

+15.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

6.65%

+12.03%

YCS vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

YCS vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison

YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.30%2.32%2.75%1.88%10.75%7.14%2.94%0.54%12.36%0.02%3.21%7.36%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YCS and LCSIX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to LCSIX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs LCSIX's -25.13%.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCS and LCSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer