PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YCS vs. IQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YCS vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCS achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 12.97% return.


YCS

1D
0.39%
1M
3.97%
YTD
10.06%
6M
11.27%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
23.65%
10Y*
13.66%

IQQQ

1D
-0.63%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
12.97%
6M
11.32%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YCS vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
10.06%9.04%15.17%
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
12.97%17.11%14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between YCS and IQQQ is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.05

The correlation between YCS and IQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YCS vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQQ
IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YCS vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YCSIQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.58

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

8.79

+4.25

YCS vs. IQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCS Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the IQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCS and IQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YCS vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCS drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, which is greater than IQQQ's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCS and IQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YCSIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.56%

-20.41%

-29.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-11.13%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.13%

+5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-3.63%

-16.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

3.25%

-0.62%

Volatility

YCS vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) is 2.25%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that YCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YCSIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

8.33%

-6.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

13.55%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

17.06%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

19.07%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

19.07%

-0.25%

YCS vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YCS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

YCS vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison

YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.


PositionTTM20252024
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
4.65%10.34%7.27%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YCS and IQQQ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQQQ has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCS dropped -49.56% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 34.18% vs 28.55% for IQQQ. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 34.18% return vs 28.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

YCS is categorized as Leveraged Currency, while IQQQ is Nasdaq-100. YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%), while IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for YCS and 0.55% for IQQQ.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCS and IQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer