PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YCBD vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YCBD vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YCBD achieves a -57.81% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 11.65% return.


YCBD

1D
12.35%
1M
-16.86%
6M
-34.48%
YTD
-57.81%
1Y
-33.78%
3Y*
-62.95%
5Y*
-76.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-67.62%

SCHX

1D
1.49%
1M
1.63%
6M
9.65%
YTD
11.65%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
15.03%
ALL TIME*
14.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$244.71M$275.73M$370.20M
$99.38K$157.51K$154.27K

YCBD vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
YCBD
cbdMD, Inc.
-57.81%-55.00%-63.94%-89.82%-78.98%-63.39%30.53%-60.42%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
11.65%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between YCBD and SCHX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2019

0.18

The correlation between YCBD and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


cbdMD, Inc.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF

Return for Risk

YCBD vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YCBD
YCBD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
YCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
YCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YCBD vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YCBDSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.32

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

2.53

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

10.64

-11.25

YCBD vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YCBD Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YCBD and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YCBD vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YCBD drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YCBD and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YCBDSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-34.33%

-65.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.25%

-9.02%

-70.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.92%

-19.04%

-76.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.95%

-25.41%

-74.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

0.00%

-99.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-3.95%

-78.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.37%

2.14%

+53.23%

Volatility

YCBD vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD) has a higher volatility of 26.49% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 3.70%. This indicates that YCBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YCBDSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.49%

3.70%

+22.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.70%

10.19%

+54.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

195.61%

12.91%

+182.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.88%

17.25%

+114.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

124.77%

18.16%

+106.61%

Dividends

YCBD vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

YCBD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%
YCBD
cbdMD, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YCBD and SCHX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCBD has higher volatility (26.49%) compared to SCHX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YCBD dropped -99.98% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YCBD and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer