YBTC vs. SOEZ

Last updated Jun 19, 2026

YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. YBTC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.

Performance

YBTC vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -25.59% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -40.79% return.

YBTC

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: -16.10%
• YTD: -25.59%
• 6M: -22.60%
• 1Y: -36.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOEZ

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -15.08%
• YTD: -40.79%
• 6M: -40.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTC vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-25.59%	-2.29%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-40.79%	-11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and SOEZ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

YBTC vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

SOEZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTC vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YBTC	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	—	—

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.82%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and SOEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBTC	SOEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.82%	-56.14%	+7.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.66%	-50.25%	+4.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.47%	-32.19%	+18.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	YBTC	SOEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.97%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.71%	70.82%	-31.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.92%	70.82%	-29.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.92%	70.82%	-29.90%

YBTC vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBTC vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.74%, more than SOEZ's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	88.74%	76.04%	44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBTC and SOEZ in my portfolio?

YBTC and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, YBTC or SOEZ?

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBTC or SOEZ?

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBTC or SOEZ?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.74%, compared with 0.93% for SOEZ.

What is the main difference between YBTC and SOEZ?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.19% for SOEZ.