PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBTC vs. PLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBTC vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -23.08% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -37.29% return.


YBTC

1D
1.15%
1M
4.67%
6M
-14.64%
YTD
-23.08%
1Y
-39.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.44%

PLTW

1D
2.04%
1M
-4.02%
6M
-20.95%
YTD
-37.29%
1Y
-28.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-13.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.58M$2.73M$3.69M
$1.48M$1.24M$1.57M

YBTC vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
-23.08%-4.75%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-37.29%28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and PLTW is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBTC vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YBTC vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YBTCPLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.96

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

-0.51

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

-0.92

-0.34

YBTC vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -48.84%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and PLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBTCPLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.84%

-57.27%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.84%

-57.27%

+8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.83%

-48.71%

+4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-25.26%

+10.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.47%

31.63%

-0.16%

Volatility

YBTC vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) is 7.36%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 15.51%. This indicates that YBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBTCPLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

15.51%

-8.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.73%

48.86%

-17.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.20%

62.65%

-22.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.43%

73.45%

-33.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.43%

73.45%

-33.02%

YBTC vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBTC vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, less than PLTW's 137.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
137.47%72.40%0.00%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
80.06%76.04%44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


YBTC and PLTW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to YBTC (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -48.84% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -28.95% vs -39.52% for YBTC. On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 7.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -28.95% return vs -39.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 137.47%, compared with 80.06% for YBTC.

YBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBTC and PLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer