YBTC vs. CLIP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. YBTC is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, YBTC returned -35.71% vs 3.96% for CLIP. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YBTC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

YBTC vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBTC achieves a -23.39% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 1.50% return.

YBTC

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -16.32%
• YTD: -23.39%
• 6M: -26.70%
• 1Y: -35.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBTC vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	-23.39%	-4.23%	58.55%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.50%	4.23%	4.96%

Correlation

The correlation between YBTC and CLIP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024	0.05

The correlation between YBTC and CLIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

YBTC vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBTC

YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBTC vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YBTC	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	17.26	-18.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.22	72.02	-73.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	20.66	-19.82
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	142.22	-142.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	1,151.15	-1,152.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YBTC vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBTC and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YBTC	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.91	17.26	-18.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	10.71	-10.55

Drawdowns

YBTC vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBTC drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBTC and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBTC	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.09%	-0.08%	-47.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.09%	-0.03%	-47.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.06%	0.00%	-44.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.89%	-0.00%	-12.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.69%	0.00%	+25.69%

Volatility

YBTC vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a higher volatility of 8.85% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.06%. This indicates that YBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YBTC	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.85%	0.06%	+8.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.81%	0.14%	+31.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.20%	0.23%	+38.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.81%	0.44%	+40.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.81%	0.44%	+40.37%

YBTC vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBTC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBTC vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

YBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.13%, more than CLIP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.91%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF	88.13%	76.04%	44.53%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBTC and CLIP in my portfolio?

YBTC and CLIP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YBTC or CLIP?

YBTC has higher volatility (8.85%) compared to CLIP (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBTC dropped -47.09% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, YBTC or CLIP?

On 1-year performance, CLIP leads with 3.96% vs -35.71% for YBTC. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YBTC or CLIP?

Over the 1-year period, CLIP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -35.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBTC or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBTC or CLIP?

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 3.91% for CLIP.

What is the main difference between YBTC and CLIP?

YBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YBTC and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.26 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.