YBIT vs. BFOC
YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - YBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. YBIT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
YBIT vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -24.59% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.39% return.
YBIT
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- YTD
- -24.59%
- 6M
- -27.08%
- 1Y
- -35.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBIT vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.59% | -21.32% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between YBIT and BFOC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YBIT vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
YBIT
BFOC
YBIT vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YBIT | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YBIT | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | -1.88 | +1.52 |
Drawdowns
YBIT vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YBIT | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.54% | -18.20% | -27.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.10% | -18.20% | -24.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -12.52% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.69% | — | — |
Volatility
YBIT vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YBIT | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.10% | 12.61% | +23.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 12.61% | +26.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 12.61% | +26.02% |
YBIT vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
YBIT vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.02%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF | 101.02% | 88.33% | 60.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YBIT and BFOC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YBIT.
YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 101.02%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
YBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YBIT and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for YBIT and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer