PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBIT vs. BCDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YBIT vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -24.59% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 3.23% return.


YBIT

1D
-2.50%
1M
-15.67%
YTD
-24.59%
6M
-27.08%
1Y
-35.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCDF

1D
-0.16%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
3.23%
6M
4.02%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBIT vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YBIT
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
-24.59%-2.49%-0.09%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
3.23%11.63%18.45%

Correlation

The correlation between YBIT and BCDF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YBIT vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBIT
YBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBIT vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YBITBCDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.08

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

0.82

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

1.85

-3.28

YBIT vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBIT and BCDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YBITBCDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

0.43

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

0.39

-0.75

Drawdowns

YBIT vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and BCDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YBITBCDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.54%

-27.70%

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.54%

-7.63%

-37.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.10%

-7.63%

-35.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.12%

-9.83%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.69%

3.39%

+21.30%

Volatility

YBIT vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.17%. This indicates that YBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YBITBCDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

5.17%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.10%

11.03%

+18.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.10%

14.76%

+21.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.63%

16.94%

+21.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.63%

16.94%

+21.69%

YBIT vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

YBIT vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.02%, more than BCDF's 2.45% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.45%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%
YBIT
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
101.02%88.33%60.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YBIT and BCDF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YBIT has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to BCDF (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBIT dropped -45.54% vs BCDF's -27.70%.

On 1-year performance, BCDF leads with 6.26% vs -35.27% for YBIT. On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BCDF has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 6.26% return vs -35.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YBIT.

YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 101.02%, compared with 2.45% for BCDF.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YBIT and 0.85% for BCDF.

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YBIT and BCDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer