PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YASLX vs. BRWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YASLX vs. BRWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) and AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YASLX achieves a 17.60% return, which is significantly higher than BRWIX's 16.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with YASLX having a 11.42% annualized return and BRWIX not far behind at 11.27%.


YASLX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.00%
YTD
17.60%
6M
16.00%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
11.42%

BRWIX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.54%
YTD
16.32%
6M
17.79%
1Y
35.31%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YASLX vs. BRWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
17.60%6.27%11.23%3.65%-13.59%24.45%12.82%17.07%-10.15%34.85%
BRWIX
AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund
16.32%21.16%3.08%13.75%-25.35%12.38%29.77%27.98%-3.67%23.65%

Correlation

The correlation between YASLX and BRWIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.56

The correlation between YASLX and BRWIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YASLX vs. BRWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YASLX
YASLX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
YASLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YASLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
YASLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
YASLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YASLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BRWIX
BRWIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BRWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BRWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YASLX vs. BRWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) and AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YASLXBRWIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

3.18

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.29

14.44

-9.16

YASLX vs. BRWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YASLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the BRWIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YASLX and BRWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YASLXBRWIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.51

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.30

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.56

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.35

+0.27

Drawdowns

YASLX vs. BRWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YASLX drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, smaller than the maximum BRWIX drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YASLX and BRWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YASLXBRWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-54.49%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-11.28%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.65%

-20.82%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.74%

-36.71%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

-36.71%

-2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-17.60%

+9.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

2.48%

+1.06%

Volatility

YASLX vs. BRWIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) is 2.62%, while AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that YASLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YASLXBRWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

4.64%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.58%

11.61%

-3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

14.31%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

18.13%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

20.16%

-5.13%

YASLX vs. BRWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YASLX has a 1.86% expense ratio, which is higher than BRWIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

YASLX vs. BRWIX - Dividend Comparison

YASLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRWIX
AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund
0.64%0.75%1.17%0.63%0.48%45.72%14.71%10.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%15.82%8.97%0.94%3.85%2.62%12.95%9.89%4.86%3.28%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


YASLX and BRWIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRWIX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to YASLX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YASLX dropped -38.91% vs BRWIX's -54.49%.

BRWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YASLX and BRWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer