YANG vs. NIOG
YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) and NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - YANG tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%) while NIOG tracks the NIO Inc. (NIO). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. YANG charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NIOG.
Performance
YANG vs. NIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YANG achieves a 62.59% return, which is significantly higher than NIOG's -30.21% return.
YANG
- 1D
- 6.41%
- 1M
- 38.66%
- YTD
- 62.59%
- 6M
- 66.09%
- 1Y
- 39.58%
- 3Y*
- -41.30%
- 5Y*
- -28.83%
- 10Y*
- -37.21%
NIOG
- 1D
- -7.05%
- 1M
- -21.38%
- YTD
- -30.21%
- 6M
- -25.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YANG vs. NIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 62.59% | -3.00% |
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | -30.21% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between YANG and NIOG is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | -0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YANG vs. NIOG — Risk / Return Rank
YANG
NIOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YANG vs. NIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YANG | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YANG vs. NIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YANG drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than NIOG's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YANG and NIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YANG | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -56.27% | -43.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -56.27% | -43.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.53% | -22.75% | -67.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | — | — |
Volatility
YANG vs. NIOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YANG | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.77% | 115.62% | -56.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.57% | 115.62% | -21.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.92% | 115.62% | -33.70% |
YANG vs. NIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
YANG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NIOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
YANG vs. NIOG - Dividend Comparison
YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while NIOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 2.27% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YANG and NIOG have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.
YANG has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.00% for NIOG.
YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%), while NIOG tracks NIO Inc. (NIO). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for YANG and 0.75% for NIOG.
Find the right allocation for YANG and NIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer