YANG vs. MUU
YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - YANG tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. YANG charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
YANG vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
YANG
- 1D
- 6.41%
- 1M
- 38.66%
- YTD
- 62.59%
- 6M
- 66.09%
- 1Y
- 39.58%
- 3Y*
- -41.30%
- 5Y*
- -28.83%
- 10Y*
- -37.21%
MUU
- 1D
- 31.07%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YANG vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 35.10% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between YANG and MUU is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YANG vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
YANG
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YANG vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YANG | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YANG vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YANG drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YANG and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YANG | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -26.63% | -73.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -3.84% | -96.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.53% | -11.62% | -78.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | — | — |
Volatility
YANG vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YANG | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.77% | 307.99% | -249.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.57% | 307.99% | -213.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.92% | 307.99% | -226.07% |
YANG vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
YANG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
YANG vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than MUU's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 2.27% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YANG and MUU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.
YANG has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.17% for MUU.
YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for YANG and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for YANG and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer