PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YANG vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YANG vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YANG vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YANG
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares
20.02%-62.77%9.16%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
41.27%599.03%-43.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YANG achieves a 20.02% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 41.27% return.


YANG

1D
2.68%
1M
9.80%
YTD
20.02%
6M
44.40%
1Y
-22.06%
3Y*
-43.56%
5Y*
-33.55%
10Y*
-39.11%

MUU

1D
17.77%
1M
-25.73%
YTD
41.27%
6M
205.92%
1Y
904.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YANG vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

YANG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YANG vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YANG
YANG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
YANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YANG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
YANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
YANG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YANG vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YANGMUUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.31

7.00

-7.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.01

3.86

-3.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.52

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

17.99

-18.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.38

50.69

-51.07

YANG vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YANG Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 7.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YANG and MUU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YANGMUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

7.00

-7.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

1.77

-2.26

Correlation

The correlation between YANG and MUU is -0.29. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

YANG vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, which matches MUU's 3.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
YANG
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares
3.40%4.03%9.42%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.67%1.54%0.56%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
3.42%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

YANG vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YANG drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YANG and MUU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YANGMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-75.07%

-24.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.02%

-52.72%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-38.92%

-61.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.42%

-25.08%

-65.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.00%

18.71%

+38.29%

Volatility

YANG vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) is 19.60%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 47.51%. This indicates that YANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YANGMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.60%

47.51%

-27.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.29%

99.28%

-55.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.59%

130.64%

-59.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.39%

127.68%

-33.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.22%

127.68%

-45.46%