YANG vs. FNDE
YANG (Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares) and FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YANG is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%), while FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YANG returned -38.18%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for FNDE. Their -0.76 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. YANG charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDE.
Performance
YANG vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YANG achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than FNDE's 15.01% return. Over the past 10 years, YANG has underperformed FNDE with an annualized return of -38.18%, while FNDE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.
YANG
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -34.03%
- 6M
- 19.25%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- -11.44%
- 3Y*
- -43.40%
- 5Y*
- -39.47%
- 10Y*
- -38.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -38.42%
FNDE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.51M | $30.86M | $33.63M | |
| $20.61M | $22.59M | $28.35M |
YANG vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 5.40% | -62.77% | -71.41% | 11.95% | -41.34% | 25.90% | -58.66% | -40.72% | 13.14% | -64.93% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 15.01% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | 14.41% | -2.77% | 19.75% | -10.37% | 26.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between YANG and FNDE is -0.69, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | -0.76 |
The correlation between YANG and FNDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YANG vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank
YANG
FNDE
YANG vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YANG | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.32 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 2.82 | -3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 8.93 | -9.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YANG vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YANG drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than FNDE's maximum drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YANG and FNDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YANG | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -43.55% | -56.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.83% | -10.23% | -25.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.02% | -18.40% | -75.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.38% | -29.44% | -67.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.36% | -39.93% | -59.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -2.07% | -97.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.59% | -11.62% | -78.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.03% | 3.22% | +15.81% |
Volatility
YANG vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) has a higher volatility of 15.88% compared to Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) at 4.42%. This indicates that YANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YANG | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.88% | 4.42% | +11.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.30% | 13.64% | +29.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.16% | 16.16% | +44.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.73% | 17.08% | +76.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.91% | 19.13% | +62.78% |
YANG vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
YANG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
YANG vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison
YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than FNDE's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.60% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 3.50% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YANG and FNDE have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YANG has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to FNDE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YANG dropped -99.98% vs FNDE's -43.55%.
On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 10.16% vs -38.18% for YANG. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 10.16% return vs -38.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YANG.
FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 3.50% for YANG.
YANG is categorized as China Equities, while FNDE is Emerging Markets Equities. YANG tracks FTSE China 50 Index (-300%), while FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for YANG and 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YANG and FNDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer