YANG vs. AFTY
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY).
YANG and AFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YANG is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Index (-300%). It was launched on Dec 3, 2009. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. Both YANG and AFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
YANG vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YANG vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 20.02% | -62.77% | -71.41% | 11.95% | -41.34% | 25.90% | -58.66% | -40.72% | 13.14% | -64.93% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 45.15% |
Returns By Period
YANG
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- 9.80%
- YTD
- 20.02%
- 6M
- 44.40%
- 1Y
- -22.06%
- 3Y*
- -43.56%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -39.11%
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YANG vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
YANG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YANG vs. AFTY — Risk / Return Rank
YANG
AFTY
YANG vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares (YANG) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YANG | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.01 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YANG | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between YANG and AFTY is -0.66. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
YANG vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison
YANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, while AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YANG Direxion Daily China 3x Bear Shares | 3.40% | 4.03% | 9.42% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.54% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
Drawdowns
YANG vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YANG | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.97% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.42% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.00% | — | — |
Volatility
YANG vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YANG | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.59% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.39% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.22% | — | — |