PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
-11.29%9.09%48.13%96.20%-1.05%
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
1.14%15.82%10.71%4.64%0.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YAMZ.NEO achieves a -11.29% return, which is significantly lower than PDIV.TO's 1.14% return.


YAMZ.NEO

1D
4.00%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
-11.29%
6M
-3.53%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
30.95%
5Y*
10Y*

PDIV.TO

1D
1.48%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
1.14%
6M
5.00%
1Y
13.80%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YAMZ.NEO has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PDIV.TO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YAMZ.NEO
YAMZ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PDIV.TO
PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YAMZ.NEOPDIV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

1.45

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

1.99

-1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.33

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

1.74

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.33

8.94

-7.62

YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YAMZ.NEO and PDIV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YAMZ.NEOPDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

1.45

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.59

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between YAMZ.NEO and PDIV.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

YAMZ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.85%, more than PDIV.TO's 12.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
16.85%14.12%8.07%7.89%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDIV.TO
Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF
12.30%12.24%12.35%11.84%6.38%5.59%6.33%5.85%6.80%25.71%5.38%8.10%

Drawdowns

YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YAMZ.NEO drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than PDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAMZ.NEO and PDIV.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YAMZ.NEOPDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-30.64%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.79%

-8.36%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.11%

-3.25%

-13.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-4.40%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.83%

1.63%

+7.20%

Volatility

YAMZ.NEO vs. PDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) at 3.48%. This indicates that YAMZ.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YAMZ.NEOPDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.04%

3.48%

+7.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.73%

5.58%

+19.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.10%

9.56%

+27.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.43%

9.89%

+24.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.43%

13.96%

+20.47%