PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
-10.15%9.09%19.47%
HBIL.TO
Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
0.12%3.05%-1.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YAMZ.NEO achieves a -10.15% return, which is significantly lower than HBIL.TO's 0.12% return.


YAMZ.NEO

1D
5.33%
1M
1.54%
YTD
-10.15%
6M
-2.65%
1Y
13.81%
3Y*
31.51%
5Y*
10Y*

HBIL.TO

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.42%
1Y
1.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YAMZ.NEO has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIL.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YAMZ.NEO
YAMZ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIL.TO
HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YAMZ.NEOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

0.88

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.77

1.24

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.16

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

1.34

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.69

3.89

-2.21

YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YAMZ.NEO and HBIL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YAMZ.NEOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

0.88

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.55

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between YAMZ.NEO and HBIL.TO is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

YAMZ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.63%, more than HBIL.TO's 7.06% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
16.63%14.12%8.07%7.89%1.02%
HBIL.TO
Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
7.06%7.49%2.58%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YAMZ.NEO drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than HBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAMZ.NEO and HBIL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YAMZ.NEOHBIL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-1.69%

-32.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.79%

-1.30%

-20.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.05%

-0.78%

-15.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-0.48%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

0.45%

+8.47%

Volatility

YAMZ.NEO vs. HBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.57% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) at 0.72%. This indicates that YAMZ.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YAMZ.NEOHBIL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.57%

0.72%

+10.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.93%

1.13%

+23.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.22%

1.85%

+35.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.46%

2.05%

+32.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.46%

2.05%

+32.41%