PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YAMZ.NEO achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than AVGY.TO's 25.75% return.


YAMZ.NEO

1D
2.01%
1M
-7.96%
YTD
5.68%
6M
10.29%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
29.37%
5Y*
10Y*

AVGY.TO

1D
-12.01%
1M
0.50%
YTD
25.75%
6M
11.32%
1Y
82.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YAMZ.NEO and AVGY.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YAMZ.NEO
YAMZ.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAMZ.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGY.TO
AVGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AVGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YAMZ.NEOAVGY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.91

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

6.72

-4.12

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YAMZ.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the AVGY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YAMZ.NEO and AVGY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YAMZ.NEOAVGY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.76

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

1.83

-0.61

Drawdowns

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YAMZ.NEO drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than AVGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAMZ.NEO and AVGY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YAMZ.NEOAVGY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-28.78%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.79%

-28.50%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.54%

-12.41%

+3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-8.44%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.75%

12.31%

-3.56%

Volatility

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAMZ.NEO) is 9.66%, while Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that YAMZ.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YAMZ.NEOAVGY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

18.51%

-8.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.71%

35.65%

-12.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.46%

47.07%

-14.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.24%

52.24%

-18.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.24%

52.24%

-18.00%

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YAMZ.NEO has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

YAMZ.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Dividend Comparison

YAMZ.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.64%, less than AVGY.TO's 21.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVGY.TO
Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units
21.68%14.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YAMZ.NEO
Amazon (AMZN) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
14.64%14.12%8.07%7.89%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


YAMZ.NEO and AVGY.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.72% for YAMZ.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 1.72% for YAMZ.NEO and 0.40% for AVGY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YAMZ.NEO and AVGY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer