PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YAMCY vs. NTDOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yamaha Corp DRC (YAMCY) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YAMCY achieves a -5.78% return, which is significantly higher than NTDOY's -32.21% return. Over the past 10 years, YAMCY has underperformed NTDOY with an annualized return of -3.81%, while NTDOY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.


YAMCY

1D
-8.21%
1M
-5.58%
YTD
-5.78%
6M
-4.49%
1Y
-5.51%
3Y*
-20.86%
5Y*
-19.81%
10Y*
-3.81%

NTDOY

1D
-0.61%
1M
-6.00%
YTD
-32.21%
6M
-43.64%
1Y
-44.08%
3Y*
2.21%
5Y*
-5.74%
10Y*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YAMCY
Yamaha Corp DRC
-5.78%0.12%-7.40%-38.04%-25.05%-16.04%3.36%36.02%12.18%23.57%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
-32.21%16.19%13.11%24.66%-10.74%-27.51%61.36%50.76%-26.56%76.94%

Correlation

The correlation between YAMCY and NTDOY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

YAMCY:

$2.78B

NTDOY:

$52.95B

EPS

YAMCY:

$56.54

NTDOY:

$92.44

PE Ratio

YAMCY:

0.12

NTDOY:

0.12

PEG Ratio

YAMCY:

0.01

NTDOY:

0.02

PS Ratio

YAMCY:

0.01

NTDOY:

0.02

PB Ratio

YAMCY:

0.01

NTDOY:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

YAMCY:

$493.39B

NTDOY:

$2.34T

Gross Profit (TTM)

YAMCY:

$185.52B

NTDOY:

$921.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

YAMCY:

$381.19B

NTDOY:

$500.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YAMCY vs. NTDOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YAMCY
YAMCY Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
YAMCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAMCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAMCY Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
YAMCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAMCY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NTDOY
NTDOY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NTDOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTDOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTDOY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NTDOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTDOY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yamaha Corp DRC (YAMCY) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YAMCYNTDOYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.14

-1.13

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.07

-1.74

+1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.81

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

-0.76

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.69

-1.43

+0.74

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YAMCY Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the NTDOY Sharpe Ratio of -1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YAMCY and NTDOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YAMCYNTDOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

-1.13

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.59

-0.19

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

0.35

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.14

-0.16

Drawdowns

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YAMCY drawdown since its inception was -72.99%, smaller than the maximum NTDOY drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YAMCY and NTDOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YAMCYNTDOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.99%

-83.59%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.98%

-58.02%

+41.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.00%

-58.02%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.99%

-58.02%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.99%

-58.02%

-14.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.62%

-54.08%

-16.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.96%

-37.57%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

30.89%

-22.88%

Volatility

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yamaha Corp DRC (YAMCY) is 13.64%, while Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY) has a volatility of 16.94%. This indicates that YAMCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTDOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YAMCYNTDOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.64%

16.94%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.47%

30.95%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.06%

39.08%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.99%

30.10%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.66%

36.29%

-2.63%

Dividends

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Dividend Comparison

Neither YAMCY nor NTDOY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
0.00%0.87%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.56%1.23%
YAMCY
Yamaha Corp DRC
0.00%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%1.36%0.00%

Financials

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yamaha Corp DRC and Nintendo Co ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B20222023202420252026
148.17B
414.65B
(YAMCY) Total Revenue
(NTDOY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

YAMCY vs. NTDOY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Yamaha Corp DRC and Nintendo Co ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
37.2%
48.3%
Portfolio components
YAMCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yamaha Corp DRC reported a gross profit of 55.17B and revenue of 148.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.

NTDOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a gross profit of 200.11B and revenue of 414.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

YAMCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yamaha Corp DRC reported an operating income of 8.41B and revenue of 148.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

NTDOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported an operating income of 60.82B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

YAMCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yamaha Corp DRC reported a net income of 4.65B and revenue of 148.17B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

NTDOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a net income of 66.39B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YAMCY and NTDOY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTDOY has higher volatility (16.94%) compared to YAMCY (13.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YAMCY dropped -72.99% vs NTDOY's -83.59%.

YAMCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YAMCY and NTDOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer