PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTDOY vs. TM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NTDOY vs. TM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTDOY achieves a -32.21% return, which is significantly lower than TM's -15.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NTDOY has outperformed TM with an annualized return of 12.51%, while TM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.


NTDOY

1D
-0.61%
1M
-6.00%
YTD
-32.21%
6M
-43.64%
1Y
-44.08%
3Y*
2.21%
5Y*
-5.74%
10Y*
12.51%

TM

1D
-0.15%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-15.81%
6M
-7.79%
1Y
-4.45%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTDOY vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
-32.21%16.19%13.11%24.66%-10.74%-27.51%61.36%50.76%-26.56%76.94%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
-15.81%13.82%8.88%38.23%-24.43%23.21%13.62%22.69%-5.81%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between NTDOY and TM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NTDOY:

$52.95B

TM:

$234.89B

EPS

NTDOY:

$92.44

TM:

$2.98K

PE Ratio

NTDOY:

0.12

TM:

0.06

PEG Ratio

NTDOY:

0.02

TM:

0.00

PS Ratio

NTDOY:

0.02

TM:

0.00

PB Ratio

NTDOY:

0.02

TM:

0.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

NTDOY:

$2.34T

TM:

$51.16T

Gross Profit (TTM)

NTDOY:

$921.95B

TM:

$8.54T

EBITDA (TTM)

NTDOY:

$500.07B

TM:

$7.11T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTDOY vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTDOY
NTDOY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NTDOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTDOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTDOY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NTDOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTDOY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TM
TM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTDOY vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTDOYTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.00

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.16

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

-0.42

-1.01

NTDOY vs. TM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTDOY Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the TM Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTDOY and TM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTDOYTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.13

-0.15

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.09

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.36

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.31

-0.17

Drawdowns

NTDOY vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTDOY drawdown since its inception was -83.59%, which is greater than TM's maximum drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTDOY and TM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTDOYTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.59%

-60.15%

-23.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.02%

-27.42%

-30.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.02%

-34.92%

-23.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.02%

-36.80%

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.02%

-36.80%

-21.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.08%

-27.42%

-26.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.57%

-20.99%

-16.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.89%

10.75%

+20.14%

Volatility

NTDOY vs. TM - Volatility Comparison

Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY) has a higher volatility of 16.94% compared to Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) at 8.10%. This indicates that NTDOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTDOYTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.94%

8.10%

+8.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.95%

20.34%

+10.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.08%

29.19%

+9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.10%

26.90%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.29%

23.63%

+12.66%

Dividends

NTDOY vs. TM - Dividend Comparison

NTDOY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
0.00%0.87%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.56%1.23%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
1.59%2.95%2.81%2.45%2.90%2.45%2.74%1.30%3.40%2.96%3.23%5.59%

Financials

NTDOY vs. TM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nintendo Co ADR and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T10.00T12.00T14.00T20222023202420252026
414.65B
12.83T
(NTDOY) Total Revenue
(TM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NTDOY vs. TM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nintendo Co ADR and Toyota Motor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
48.3%
15.1%
Portfolio components
NTDOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a gross profit of 200.11B and revenue of 414.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

TM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

NTDOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported an operating income of 60.82B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

TM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

NTDOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a net income of 66.39B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

TM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NTDOY and TM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTDOY has higher volatility (16.94%) compared to TM (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTDOY dropped -83.59% vs TM's -60.15%.

TM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTDOY and TM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer