PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YACKX vs. LEXCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YACKX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YACKX achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than LEXCX's 23.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with YACKX having a 12.06% annualized return and LEXCX not far behind at 11.92%.


YACKX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.11%
6M
11.30%
YTD
14.73%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
12.06%

LEXCX

1D
0.37%
1M
2.14%
6M
21.72%
YTD
23.42%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YACKX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YACKX
AMG Yacktman Fund
14.73%19.64%4.83%15.46%-7.50%19.66%15.25%17.71%2.79%18.25%
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
23.42%7.04%3.60%14.53%3.95%26.77%4.36%21.43%-5.44%16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between YACKX and LEXCX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1992

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between YACKX and LEXCX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YACKX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YACKX
YACKX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
YACKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YACKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
YACKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
YACKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
YACKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LEXCX
LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YACKX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YACKXLEXCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.91

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.76

9.35

+2.41

YACKX vs. LEXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YACKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the LEXCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YACKX and LEXCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YACKX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YACKX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum LEXCX drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YACKX and LEXCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YACKXLEXCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-50.42%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-6.22%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-14.03%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

-19.75%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

-39.21%

+8.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

0.00%

-4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-7.11%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.49%

-0.19%

Volatility

YACKX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) is 3.98%, while Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that YACKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YACKXLEXCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.49%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

10.89%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

14.08%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.95%

16.47%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.78%

18.97%

-5.19%

YACKX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YACKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

YACKX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison

YACKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.47%, more than LEXCX's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEXCX
Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund
1.17%1.65%1.66%1.58%1.65%1.54%1.91%1.86%2.03%1.79%3.93%2.37%
YACKX
AMG Yacktman Fund
15.47%17.75%9.70%4.39%7.35%3.72%10.82%9.31%23.06%10.67%8.57%13.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


YACKX and LEXCX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEXCX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to YACKX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YACKX dropped -46.65% vs LEXCX's -50.42%.

YACKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YACKX and LEXCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer