YACKX vs. ARSVX
YACKX (AMG Yacktman Fund) and ARSVX (AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - YACKX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG, while ARSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, YACKX returned 12.37%/yr vs 9.40%/yr for ARSVX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YACKX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ARSVX.
Performance
YACKX vs. ARSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YACKX achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly higher than ARSVX's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, YACKX has outperformed ARSVX with an annualized return of 12.37%, while ARSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.40% annualized return.
YACKX
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 14.69%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- 1Y
- 9.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
ARSVX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- -2.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
YACKX vs. ARSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 14.69% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 3.07% | -7.36% | 14.05% | 14.86% | -6.49% | 21.14% | 1.84% | 38.29% | -6.96% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between YACKX and ARSVX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2005 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between YACKX and ARSVX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YACKX vs. ARSVX — Risk / Return Rank
YACKX
ARSVX
YACKX vs. ARSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YACKX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | -0.10 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | -0.20 | +1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YACKX vs. ARSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YACKX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum ARSVX drawdown of -54.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YACKX and ARSVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YACKX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -54.85% | +8.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.30% | -16.62% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -19.21% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.86% | -19.21% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.93% | -40.52% | +9.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -10.28% | +5.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -8.68% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.62% | 8.38% | -2.76% |
Volatility
YACKX vs. ARSVX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) at 3.22%. This indicates that YACKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YACKX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 3.22% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.88% | 13.85% | +6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 17.14% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 17.85% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 19.36% | -3.17% |
YACKX vs. ARSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
YACKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSVX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
YACKX vs. ARSVX - Dividend Comparison
Neither YACKX nor ARSVX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 4.78% | 3.87% | 7.75% | 0.00% | 12.10% | 13.01% | 14.96% | 4.96% | 6.51% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YACKX and ARSVX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YACKX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to ARSVX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YACKX dropped -46.65% vs ARSVX's -54.85%.
YACKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YACKX and ARSVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer