XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE
XZSP.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and SPQB.DE (Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - XZSP.DE tracks the S&P 500 ESG while SPQB.DE tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XZSP.DE returned 18.55%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for SPQB.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XZSP.DE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPQB.DE.
Performance
XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XZSP.DE achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPQB.DE's 5.30% return.
XZSP.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 11.67%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPQB.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XZSP.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 11.17% | 5.34% | 31.24% | 17.80% |
SPQB.DE Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF | 5.30% | -0.77% | 20.64% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XZSP.DE and SPQB.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XZSP.DE and SPQB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XZSP.DE
SPQB.DE
XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZSP.DE) and Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XZSP.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.27 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.53 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.72 | 9.14 | +6.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XZSP.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 1.48 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 1.11 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XZSP.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than SPQB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZSP.DE and SPQB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XZSP.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -16.15% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -3.10% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.40% | -16.15% | -7.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -2.58% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.20% | +0.62% |
Volatility
XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZSP.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer UCITS ETF (SPQB.DE) at 1.19%. This indicates that XZSP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPQB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XZSP.DE | SPQB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 1.19% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 4.25% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 7.42% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 9.54% | +4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 9.54% | +4.72% |
XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XZSP.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SPQB.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XZSP.DE vs. SPQB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XZSP.DE nor SPQB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XZSP.DE and SPQB.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XZSP.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XZSP.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPQB.DE.
XZSP.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG, while SPQB.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 5% Buffer Protect. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XZSP.DE and 0.50% for SPQB.DE.
Find the right allocation for XZSP.DE and SPQB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer