XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE
XZMJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - XZMJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders while EUNN.DE tracks the MSCI Japan IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XZMJ.DE returned 8.68%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for EUNN.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XZMJ.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUNN.DE.
Performance
XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XZMJ.DE achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 16.53% return.
XZMJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 15.31%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XZMJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 15.31% | 10.86% | 16.16% | 14.60% | -16.13% | 7.04% | 9.18% | 26.74% | -13.08% |
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.53% | 13.46% | 12.90% | 15.16% | -11.47% | 9.25% | 4.10% | 22.24% | -12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XZMJ.DE and EUNN.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between XZMJ.DE and EUNN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XZMJ.DE
EUNN.DE
XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XZMJ.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.32 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.14 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 10.51 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XZMJ.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.67 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XZMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.90%, smaller than the maximum EUNN.DE drawdown of -28.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMJ.DE and EUNN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XZMJ.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.90% | -28.55% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -9.58% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.78% | -15.81% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.52% | -19.41% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.27% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -6.85% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 2.86% | +0.97% |
Volatility
XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) at 3.16%. This indicates that XZMJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XZMJ.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 3.16% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 14.53% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.61% | 17.97% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 16.04% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 16.08% | +1.41% |
XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XZMJ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XZMJ.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XZMJ.DE nor EUNN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XZMJ.DE and EUNN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XZMJ.DE.
XZMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XZMJ.DE and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.
Find the right allocation for XZMJ.DE and EUNN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer