PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZMJ.DE achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than 36B4.DE's 8.61% return.


XZMJ.DE

1D
-2.48%
1M
-3.92%
6M
7.93%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*

36B4.DE

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.83%
6M
4.52%
YTD
8.61%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XZMJ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C
13.09%10.86%16.16%14.57%-16.10%7.03%9.17%16.10%
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
8.61%6.64%9.02%9.56%-13.77%9.87%6.38%16.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMJ.DE and 36B4.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.94

The correlation between XZMJ.DE and 36B4.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMJ.DE
XZMJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

36B4.DE
36B4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XZMJ.DE36B4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.76

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

5.09

+2.37

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the 36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMJ.DE and 36B4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.29%, which is greater than 36B4.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMJ.DE and 36B4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZMJ.DE36B4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.29%

-26.98%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-10.82%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-15.67%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-21.57%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-2.03%

-4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-7.09%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

3.75%

+0.14%

Volatility

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) at 4.74%. This indicates that XZMJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36B4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZMJ.DE36B4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

4.74%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.79%

14.24%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.75%

18.44%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

16.33%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

17.25%

+2.74%

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XZMJ.DE and 36B4.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZMJ.DE vs. 36B4.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZMJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36B4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.48%1.46%1.38%1.81%2.45%1.54%1.60%0.81%
XZMJ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZMJ.DE and 36B4.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZMJ.DE and 36B4.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

XZMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while 36B4.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZMJ.DE and 36B4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer