PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZMD.DE achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than XDEW.DE's 14.15% return.


XZMD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
6M
8.17%
YTD
9.01%
1Y
20.75%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
10Y*

XDEW.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.80%
6M
10.18%
YTD
14.15%
1Y
19.97%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZMD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D
9.01%5.05%32.63%26.55%-13.35%
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
14.15%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XZMD.DE and XDEW.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2022

0.77

The correlation between XZMD.DE and XDEW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZMD.DE
XZMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XZMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XZMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XZMD.DEXDEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.93

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

12.11

-5.26

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZMD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZMD.DE and XDEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.74%, smaller than the maximum XDEW.DE drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZMD.DE and XDEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZMD.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.74%

-38.79%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-5.06%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.74%

-22.70%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.92%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-5.33%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

1.65%

+1.39%

Volatility

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D (XZMD.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) at 2.73%. This indicates that XZMD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZMD.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

2.73%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

6.91%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

10.64%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

14.91%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

16.80%

-0.67%

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZMD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZMD.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while XDEW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XZMD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG UCITS ETF 1D
0.68%0.81%0.91%0.97%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZMD.DE and XDEW.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZMD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZMD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

XZMD.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XDEW.DE is S&P 500. XZMD.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XZMD.DE and 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZMD.DE and XDEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer