PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHY.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZHY.DE achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.


XZHY.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.04%
YTD
2.61%
6M
1.91%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
10Y*

XNAS.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
7.97%
YTD
20.53%
6M
18.71%
1Y
37.14%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XZHY.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
2.61%-3.17%13.38%8.40%-5.92%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
20.53%7.11%33.75%51.36%-13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XZHY.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZHY.DE
XZHY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XZHY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZHY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZHY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XZHY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZHY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHY.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZHY.DEXNAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.77

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.98

11.16

-6.18

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZHY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZHY.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZHY.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.40

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.91

-0.43

Drawdowns

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZHY.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum XNAS.DE drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZHY.DE and XNAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZHY.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-31.25%

+19.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-10.00%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.51%

-26.72%

+15.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-0.83%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-7.83%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

3.38%

-2.39%

Volatility

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XZHY.DE) is 1.29%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that XZHY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZHY.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

4.31%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

10.91%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.83%

15.71%

-9.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.58%

19.88%

-12.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.58%

19.84%

-12.26%

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZHY.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZHY.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZHY.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZHY.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XZHY.DE.

XZHY.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XZHY.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI US High Yield Sustainable and SRI, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZHY.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZHY.DE and XNAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer