PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEM.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZEM.DE achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than UEF5.DE's 34.15% return.


XZEM.DE

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.22%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.70%
1Y
27.23%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*

UEF5.DE

1D
-1.52%
1M
8.51%
YTD
34.15%
6M
36.47%
1Y
60.24%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XZEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C
11.70%16.53%16.91%0.19%-14.31%-4.19%6.11%9.91%
UEF5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
34.15%21.04%15.43%3.76%-15.31%7.01%5.32%6.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XZEM.DE and UEF5.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019

0.90

The correlation between XZEM.DE and UEF5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZEM.DE
XZEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XZEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

UEF5.DE
UEF5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
UEF5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEM.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZEM.DEUEF5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.55

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

6.29

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

21.83

-13.48

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the UEF5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZEM.DE and UEF5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZEM.DEUEF5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

3.14

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.57

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.41

-0.12

Drawdowns

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, roughly equal to the maximum UEF5.DE drawdown of -36.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZEM.DE and UEF5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZEM.DEUEF5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.16%

-36.71%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.55%

-9.52%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-20.41%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-24.34%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-2.55%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-9.99%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.75%

+0.50%

Volatility

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEM.DE) is 5.92%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that XZEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEF5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZEM.DEUEF5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

8.72%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.59%

15.86%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

19.10%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

17.66%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

18.88%

+1.84%

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than UEF5.DE's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZEM.DE vs. UEF5.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UEF5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UEF5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.58%2.19%1.73%2.36%2.19%1.32%1.89%2.00%2.16%2.00%2.30%1.65%
XZEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XZEM.DE and UEF5.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UEF5.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEF5.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XZEM.DE.

XZEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Low Carbon SRI Leaders, while UEF5.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XZEM.DE and 0.24% for UEF5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZEM.DE and UEF5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer