PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEF5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.77%21.04%15.43%3.76%-15.31%7.01%5.32%14.48%-7.65%16.40%
QDVS.DE
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF
2.92%16.78%11.26%-2.12%-12.39%6.97%6.67%19.37%-6.54%18.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEF5.DE achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly higher than QDVS.DE's 2.92% return.


UEF5.DE

1D
-1.04%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
4.77%
6M
11.32%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
6.97%

QDVS.DE

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
2.92%
6M
7.01%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEF5.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEF5.DE
UEF5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UEF5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEF5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVS.DE
QDVS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEF5.DEQDVS.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

1.33

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

1.82

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.86

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.11

10.71

+2.40

UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEF5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEF5.DE and QDVS.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UEF5.DEQDVS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.33

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.17

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.33

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between UEF5.DE and QDVS.DE is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Dividend Comparison

UEF5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while QDVS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UEF5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.03%2.19%1.73%2.36%2.19%1.32%1.89%2.00%2.16%2.00%2.30%1.65%
QDVS.DE
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEF5.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.71%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVS.DE drawdown of -36.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEF5.DE and QDVS.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UEF5.DEQDVS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.71%

-36.51%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-10.19%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.34%

-25.09%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.96%

-8.36%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.11%

-8.94%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.72%

-0.08%

Volatility

UEF5.DE vs. QDVS.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UEF5.DE) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) have volatilities of 7.11% and 7.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UEF5.DEQDVS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

7.00%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

12.69%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.50%

18.28%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

16.59%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

18.61%

+0.03%