HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE).
HGGA.DE and SPFV.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HGGA.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 1-3 SRI Carbon ESG-Weighted. It was launched on Dec 13, 2021. SPFV.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (USD Hedged). It was launched on Oct 9, 2019. Both HGGA.DE and SPFV.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGGA.DE HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF | 1.36% | -4.17% | 5.69% | 0.16% | -1.86% |
SPFV.DE SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 1.98% | -7.02% | 9.30% | 3.44% | -4.84% |
Different Trading Currencies
HGGA.DE is traded in EUR, while SPFV.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPFV.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGGA.DE achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPFV.DE's 1.98% return.
HGGA.DE
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- -1.80%
- 3Y*
- 0.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPFV.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- -2.76%
- 3Y*
- 1.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HGGA.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPFV.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
HGGA.DE
SPFV.DE
HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGGA.DE | SPFV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | -0.37 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | -0.45 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.94 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | -0.20 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | -0.30 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGGA.DE | SPFV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | -0.37 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.03 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between HGGA.DE and SPFV.DE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither HGGA.DE nor SPFV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGGA.DE drawdown since its inception was -8.58%, smaller than the maximum SPFV.DE drawdown of -11.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGGA.DE and SPFV.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGGA.DE | SPFV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -15.26% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -2.35% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.51% | -1.44% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -4.71% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 0.71% | +2.02% |
Volatility
HGGA.DE vs. SPFV.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC Bloomberg Global Sustainable Aggregate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF (HGGA.DE) is 1.20%, while SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (SPFV.DE) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that HGGA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPFV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HGGA.DE | SPFV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 2.27% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | 4.30% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10% | 7.43% | -3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 7.91% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 7.66% | -2.60% |