PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZBU.DE achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than XDEW.DE's 14.50% return.


XZBU.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
6M
0.58%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*

XDEW.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.32%
6M
9.75%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XZBU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
2.09%-3.98%6.63%5.34%-13.42%6.21%-1.24%
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
14.50%-0.46%18.66%10.08%-6.94%41.59%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XZBU.DE and XDEW.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.23

The correlation between XZBU.DE and XDEW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZBU.DE
XZBU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XZBU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XZBU.DEXDEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.35

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.91

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

12.05

-8.62

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZBU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZBU.DE and XDEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZBU.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum XDEW.DE drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZBU.DE and XDEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZBU.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-38.79%

+21.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.73%

-5.06%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.28%

-22.70%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-22.70%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-0.61%

-5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-5.33%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.65%

-0.15%

Volatility

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) is 1.63%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that XZBU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZBU.DEXDEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

2.81%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

6.82%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.21%

10.43%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.12%

14.90%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.88%

16.80%

-7.92%

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZBU.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZBU.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZBU.DE nor XDEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XZBU.DE and XDEW.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZBU.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZBU.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

XZBU.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XDEW.DE is S&P 500. XZBU.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XZBU.DE and 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZBU.DE and XDEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer