PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) and Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XZBU.DE achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than PRAP.DE's 2.44% return.


XZBU.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.16%
6M
0.58%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*

PRAP.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
0.32%
6M
0.91%
YTD
2.44%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XZBU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
2.09%-3.98%6.63%5.34%-13.42%6.21%-1.24%
PRAP.DE
Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.44%-3.96%7.69%4.70%-10.24%6.82%-1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XZBU.DE and PRAP.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.92

The correlation between XZBU.DE and PRAP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZBU.DE
XZBU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XZBU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAP.DE
PRAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) and Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XZBU.DEPRAP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.53

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

3.88

-0.45

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZBU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZBU.DE and PRAP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZBU.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, roughly equal to the maximum PRAP.DE drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZBU.DE and PRAP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZBU.DEPRAP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-18.71%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.73%

-3.62%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.28%

-11.80%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-13.30%

-4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-6.35%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-10.13%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.42%

+0.08%

Volatility

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) at 1.49%. This indicates that XZBU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRAP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZBU.DEPRAP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

1.49%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.26%

4.06%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.21%

6.07%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.12%

8.33%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.88%

9.55%

-0.67%

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZBU.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAP.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZBU.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XZBU.DE nor PRAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XZBU.DE and PRAP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRAP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZBU.DE.

XZBU.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while PRAP.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Liquid Issuer Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XZBU.DE and 0.07% for PRAP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZBU.DE and PRAP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer