PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) and Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (Acc) (LYEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAP.DE achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly higher than LYEB.DE's 1.19% return.


PRAP.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.93%
6M
3.54%
YTD
3.31%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*

LYEB.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.82%
6M
1.32%
YTD
1.19%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
0.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRAP.DE
Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
3.31%-3.96%7.69%4.70%-10.24%6.82%-11.43%
LYEB.DE
Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.19%2.75%4.14%7.04%-13.33%-1.08%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAP.DE and LYEB.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020

0.38

The correlation between PRAP.DE and LYEB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAP.DE
PRAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LYEB.DE
LYEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
LYEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LYEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) and Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (Acc) (LYEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRAP.DELYEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.72

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

2.38

+2.76

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the LYEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAP.DE and LYEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAP.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, which is greater than LYEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAP.DE and LYEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAP.DELYEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.71%

-17.06%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

-2.67%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.80%

-2.67%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.30%

-17.06%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-1.21%

-4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-2.74%

-7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

0.81%

+0.57%

Volatility

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to Amundi EUR Corporate Bond Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (Acc) (LYEB.DE) at 0.61%. This indicates that PRAP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAP.DELYEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

0.61%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

2.60%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.18%

3.00%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.34%

4.34%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.57%

4.31%

+5.26%

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAP.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LYEB.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRAP.DE vs. LYEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAP.DE nor LYEB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PRAP.DE and LYEB.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for LYEB.DE.

PRAP.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Liquid Issuer Index, while LYEB.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate Paris Aligned Green Tilted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PRAP.DE and 0.14% for LYEB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAP.DE and LYEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer