PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) and iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XZBU.DE having a 1.33% return and IBCD.DE slightly lower at 1.30%.


XZBU.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.33%
6M
0.54%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
2.09%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*

IBCD.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
1.19%
YTD
1.30%
6M
0.27%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
1.65%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
1.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XZBU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
1.33%-3.98%6.63%5.34%-13.42%6.21%-1.19%
IBCD.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.30%-4.58%6.33%4.97%-12.66%6.14%-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between XZBU.DE and IBCD.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020

0.97

The correlation between XZBU.DE and IBCD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XZBU.DE
XZBU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XZBU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZBU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCD.DE
IBCD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IBCD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) and iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XZBU.DEIBCD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.09

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

0.75

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

1.78

+0.51

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XZBU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the IBCD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XZBU.DE and IBCD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XZBU.DEIBCD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.47

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.05

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.16

-0.17

Drawdowns

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XZBU.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum IBCD.DE drawdown of -41.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XZBU.DE and IBCD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XZBU.DEIBCD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-41.86%

+24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.73%

-3.93%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.28%

-12.36%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-17.12%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.99%

-7.49%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-9.84%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

1.65%

-0.17%

Volatility

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.DE) is 1.25%, while iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that XZBU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XZBU.DEIBCD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.33%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.28%

4.22%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.18%

6.21%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.15%

9.18%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

9.07%

-0.12%

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XZBU.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCD.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XZBU.DE vs. IBCD.DE - Dividend Comparison

XZBU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCD.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.24%4.39%4.52%4.34%3.60%2.21%2.56%3.06%3.09%3.02%2.97%3.00%
XZBU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XZBU.DE and IBCD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XZBU.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZBU.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCD.DE.

XZBU.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while IBCD.DE tracks iBoxx® USD Liquid Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XZBU.DE and 0.20% for IBCD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XZBU.DE and IBCD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer