IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE).

IBCD.DE and EUNA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBCD.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx® USD Liquid Investment Grade. It was launched on Mar 15, 2003. EUNA.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. Both IBCD.DE and EUNA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBCD.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)	1.13%	-4.58%	6.33%	4.97%	-12.66%	6.14%	0.35%	20.25%	-0.24%	-1.69%
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	-0.71%	2.79%	1.60%	4.36%	-13.52%	-2.37%	3.70%	5.06%	-1.17%	-0.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCD.DE achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.71% return.

IBCD.DE

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: -2.33%
• 3Y*: 1.58%
• 5Y*: 0.09%
• 10Y*: 2.03%

EUNA.DE

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -1.18%
• YTD: -0.71%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 1.10%
• 3Y*: 1.86%
• 5Y*: -1.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCD.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IBCD.DE

iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)

EUNA.DE

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc

Return for Risk

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCD.DE

IBCD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8
IBCD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
IBCD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
IBCD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IBCD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
IBCD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

EUNA.DE

EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 16
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBCD.DE	EUNA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	0.30	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	0.44	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.05	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	0.19	-0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	0.49	-0.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCD.DE and EUNA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBCD.DE	EUNA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	0.30	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	-0.28	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	-0.06	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between IBCD.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBCD.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)	4.24%	4.39%	4.52%	4.34%	3.60%	2.21%	2.56%	3.06%	3.09%	3.02%	2.97%	3.00%
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCD.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.86%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCD.DE and EUNA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBCD.DE	EUNA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.86%	-17.79%	-24.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.01%	-2.57%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.12%	-17.03%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.65%	-8.89%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.85%	-6.72%	-3.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	0.97%	+2.70%

Volatility

IBCD.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.69%. This indicates that IBCD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBCD.DE	EUNA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	1.69%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.43%	2.39%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.41%	3.60%	+5.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.22%	4.58%	+4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.10%	4.27%	+4.83%