PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYZY vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYZY vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZY achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -24.20% return.


XYZY

1D
0.97%
1M
10.65%
6M
2.44%
YTD
9.47%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDMN

1D
-4.67%
1M
-12.10%
6M
-35.06%
YTD
-24.20%
1Y
42.34%
3Y*
48.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYZY vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XYZY
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF
9.47%-29.43%21.72%44.46%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-24.20%237.09%28.23%20.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XYZY and GDMN is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYZY vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZY
XYZY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XYZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZY vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYZYGDMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.16

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

0.85

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.40

1.94

-1.53

XYZY vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZY Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZY and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYZY vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, roughly equal to the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZY and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYZYGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-52.82%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.72%

-50.24%

+12.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.26%

-50.24%

+18.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-19.47%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.88%

21.89%

-4.01%

Volatility

XYZY vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF (XYZY) is 8.75%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 19.22%. This indicates that XYZY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYZYGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.75%

19.22%

-10.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.81%

54.87%

-24.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.43%

64.65%

-25.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.84%

48.33%

-6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.84%

48.33%

-6.49%

XYZY vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYZY vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

XYZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.43%, more than GDMN's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
3.56%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%
XYZY
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF
87.43%95.35%62.54%9.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYZY and GDMN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (19.22%) compared to XYZY (8.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZY dropped -52.30% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

On 1-year performance, GDMN leads with 42.34% vs 7.22% for XYZY. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XYZY has been the lower-risk option at 8.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 42.34% return vs 7.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for XYZY.

XYZY has the higher dividend yield at 87.43%, compared with 3.56% for GDMN.

XYZY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDMN is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XYZY and 0.45% for GDMN.

GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYZY and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer