PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYZ vs. EVLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYZ vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Block, Inc (XYZ) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZ achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than EVLN's 1.45% return.


XYZ

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
8.91%
6M
13.99%
1Y
11.01%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
-19.80%
10Y*
22.25%

EVLN

1D
0.08%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.70%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYZ vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XYZ
Block, Inc
8.91%-23.41%23.48%
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
1.45%5.59%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between XYZ and EVLN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYZ vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZ
XYZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZ vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Block, Inc (XYZ) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYZEVLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.56

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

2.80

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

9.13

-8.48

XYZ vs. EVLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the EVLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZ and EVLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYZEVLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

2.64

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

2.56

-2.26

Drawdowns

XYZ vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZ drawdown since its inception was -86.08%, which is greater than EVLN's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZ and EVLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYZEVLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.08%

-2.78%

-83.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.48%

-1.77%

-37.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.84%

0.00%

-74.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.99%

-0.22%

-40.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.99%

0.54%

+16.45%

Volatility

XYZ vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison

Block, Inc (XYZ) has a higher volatility of 13.37% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) at 0.45%. This indicates that XYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYZEVLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.37%

0.45%

+12.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.04%

1.62%

+33.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.53%

1.87%

+44.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.97%

2.43%

+57.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.67%

2.43%

+54.24%

Dividends

XYZ vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison

XYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%.


PositionTTM20252024
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
6.91%7.28%6.41%
XYZ
Block, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYZ and EVLN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYZ has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to EVLN (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZ dropped -86.08% vs EVLN's -2.78%.

EVLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYZ and EVLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer