PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XYLU.L is traded in USD, while XEWG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XEWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLU.L achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than XEWG.L's 12.11% return.


XYLU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
3.00%
6M
7.00%
YTD
8.52%
1Y
17.96%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.70%

XEWG.L

1D
1.57%
1M
3.25%
6M
5.81%
YTD
12.11%
1Y
17.05%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.10M$912.40K$913.50K
$196.14K$234.50K$262.11K

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XYLU.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD
8.52%7.85%18.11%1.33%
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged
12.11%19.44%9.80%4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLU.L and XEWG.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023

0.54

The correlation between XYLU.L and XEWG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLU.L
XYLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XYLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XEWG.L
XEWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLU.LXEWG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.22

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.76

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

5.89

+11.49

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the XEWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLU.L and XEWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum XEWG.L drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLU.L and XEWG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLU.LXEWG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-38.44%

+21.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

-9.63%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-18.34%

+1.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-10.64%

+8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.87%

-1.84%

Volatility

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) is 2.50%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged (XEWG.L) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that XYLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLU.LXEWG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

3.58%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

10.15%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.93%

13.84%

-5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

20.82%

-10.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

20.82%

-10.46%

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XEWG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLU.L vs. XEWG.L - Dividend Comparison

XYLU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, more than XEWG.L's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XEWG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1D GBP Hedged
1.14%1.25%1.50%1.24%1.20%
XYLU.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD
11.75%10.48%7.24%3.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLU.L and XEWG.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEWG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEWG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XYLU.L.

XYLU.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while XEWG.L is S&P 500. XYLU.L tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT Index, while XEWG.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight (GBP Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XYLU.L and 0.30% for XEWG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLU.L and XEWG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer