PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XYLU.L is traded in USD, while HDLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HDLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLU.L achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than HDLG.L's 14.30% return.


XYLU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
3.00%
6M
7.00%
YTD
8.52%
1Y
17.96%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.70%

HDLG.L

1D
1.45%
1M
4.55%
6M
9.92%
YTD
14.30%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
6.78%
ALL TIME*
4.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$896.79K$940.83K$1.44M
$196.14K$234.50K$262.11K

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XYLU.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD
8.52%7.85%18.11%1.33%
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
14.30%3.71%16.48%5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLU.L and HDLG.L is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023

0.15

The correlation between XYLU.L and HDLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLU.L
XYLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XYLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLG.L
HDLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLU.LHDLG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.24

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

2.25

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

5.02

+12.36

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the HDLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLU.L and HDLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum HDLG.L drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLU.L and HDLG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLU.LHDLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-40.58%

+23.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.17%

-6.96%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-14.74%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-11.87%

+9.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

3.12%

-2.09%

Volatility

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) is 2.50%, while Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that XYLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLU.LHDLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

3.69%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

8.59%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.93%

11.00%

-3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

14.04%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

16.23%

-5.87%

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HDLG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLU.L vs. HDLG.L - Dividend Comparison

XYLU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, more than HDLG.L's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLG.L
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
3.36%3.94%3.46%4.11%3.49%3.30%4.65%3.77%3.67%3.17%2.88%1.86%
XYLU.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD
11.75%10.48%7.24%3.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLU.L and HDLG.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDLG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDLG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XYLU.L.

XYLU.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while HDLG.L is S&P 500. XYLU.L tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT Index, while HDLG.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XYLU.L and 0.30% for HDLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLU.L and HDLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer