XYLU.L vs. CWII
XYLU.L (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XYLU.L is passively managed, while CWII is actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYLU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.
Performance
XYLU.L vs. CWII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLU.L achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 35.03% return.
XYLU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -10.42%
- YTD
- 35.03%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLU.L vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYLU.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD | 5.28% | 3.81% |
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 35.03% | -42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLU.L and CWII is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLU.L vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank
XYLU.L
CWII
XYLU.L vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLU.L | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLU.L | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | -0.40 | +1.51 |
Drawdowns
XYLU.L vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -48.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLU.L and CWII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLU.L | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -48.46% | +31.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.90% | +21.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -30.49% | +28.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | — | — |
Volatility
XYLU.L vs. CWII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLU.L | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 88.33% | -81.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 88.33% | -77.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.44% | 88.33% | -77.89% |
XYLU.L vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLU.L vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison
XYLU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%, less than CWII's 21.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 21.06% | 6.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLU.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD | 10.27% | 10.48% | 8.49% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLU.L and CWII have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XYLU.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLU.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XYLU.L and 1.03% for CWII.
Find the right allocation for XYLU.L and CWII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer