XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L
XYLU.L (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD) and CEGI.L (REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Derivative Income funds. XYLU.L is passively managed, while CEGI.L is actively managed. Over the past year, XYLU.L returned 17.96% vs 29.90% for CEGI.L. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XYLU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CEGI.L.
Performance
XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLU.L achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than CEGI.L's 17.61% return.
XYLU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.70%
CEGI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- 29.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 33.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.98K | $33.81K | $43.26K | |
| $196.14K | $234.50K | $262.11K |
XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYLU.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD | 8.52% | 9.63% |
CEGI.L REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing | 17.61% | 15.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLU.L and CEGI.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.50 |
The correlation between XYLU.L and CEGI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L — Risk / Return Rank
XYLU.L
CEGI.L
XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYLU.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.16 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 1.07 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.37 | 2.33 | +15.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum CEGI.L drawdown of -27.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLU.L and CEGI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLU.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -27.98% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.17% | -27.98% | +22.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -12.08% | +11.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -9.54% | +7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 12.81% | -11.78% |
Volatility
XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) is 2.50%, while REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that XYLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEGI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLU.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 11.82% | -9.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | 26.57% | -19.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.93% | 35.79% | -27.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 35.00% | -24.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 35.00% | -24.64% |
XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CEGI.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLU.L vs. CEGI.L - Dividend Comparison
XYLU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, less than CEGI.L's 19.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEGI.L REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing | 19.50% | 9.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLU.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD | 11.75% | 10.48% | 7.24% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLU.L and CEGI.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XYLU.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLU.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CEGI.L.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XYLU.L and 0.65% for CEGI.L.
Find the right allocation for XYLU.L and CEGI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer