XYLP.L vs. COPG.L

Last updated Jul 29, 2026

XYLP.L (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF) and COPG.L (Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLP.L is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT Index, while COPG.L is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XYLP.L returned 8.56%/yr vs 24.63%/yr for COPG.L. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XYLP.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPG.L.

Performance

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XYLP.L having a 8.08% return and COPG.L slightly lower at 7.97%.

XYLP.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 8.08%
• 1Y: 14.95%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.25%

COPG.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: -10.61%
• YTD: 7.97%
• 1Y: 79.16%
• 3Y*: 24.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc	£1.29M	£1.89M	£3.06M
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF	£165.83K	£168.59K	£165.34K

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF	8.08%	-1.18%	19.03%	-20.73%
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc	7.97%	82.05%	3.66%	3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLP.L and COPG.L is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023	0.14

Return for Risk

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLP.L

XYLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
XYLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XYLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XYLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
XYLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
XYLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

COPG.L

COPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
COPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
COPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
COPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
COPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) and Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XYLP.L	COPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.89	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.42	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.29	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	3.03	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	7.62	+3.09

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the COPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLP.L and COPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.57%, smaller than the maximum COPG.L drawdown of -38.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLP.L and COPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYLP.L	COPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.57%	-38.84%	+15.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.39%	-26.29%	+21.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.30%	-38.84%	+19.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-18.44%	+18.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.94%	-15.14%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.40%	10.42%	-9.02%

Volatility

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) is 2.34%, while Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that XYLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYLP.L	COPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.34%	13.18%	-10.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.40%	35.77%	-29.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.01%	42.07%	-34.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.04%	35.36%	-18.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	35.36%	-18.32%

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than COPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XYLP.L vs. COPG.L - Dividend Comparison

XYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%, while COPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF	8.31%	9.01%	6.22%	3.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYLP.L and COPG.L in my portfolio?

XYLP.L and COPG.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XYLP.L or COPG.L?

On fees, XYLP.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XYLP.L or COPG.L?

XYLP.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPG.L.

What is the main difference between XYLP.L and COPG.L?

XYLP.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while COPG.L is Copper. XYLP.L tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT Index, while COPG.L tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XYLP.L and 0.65% for COPG.L.