PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLG vs. WTPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLG vs. WTPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than WTPI's 4.36% return.


XYLG

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.64%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.25%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*

WTPI

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.45%
YTD
4.36%
6M
3.64%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLG vs. WTPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
7.51%12.93%22.31%18.16%-15.46%23.81%12.13%
WTPI
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
4.36%14.45%17.18%15.53%-10.11%20.94%9.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLG and WTPI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2020

0.80

The correlation between XYLG and WTPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLG vs. WTPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLG
XYLG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

WTPI
WTPI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLG vs. WTPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLGWTPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.58

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.00

12.19

+3.81

XYLG vs. WTPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the WTPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLG and WTPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLG vs. WTPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum WTPI drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and WTPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLGWTPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-28.40%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-7.15%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.42%

-15.26%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-16.56%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.39%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-3.43%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

1.51%

-0.11%

Volatility

XYLG vs. WTPI - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLGWTPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.19%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

7.55%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.90%

9.27%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

12.21%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

13.26%

+0.60%

XYLG vs. WTPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WTPI's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLG vs. WTPI - Dividend Comparison

XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.57%, more than WTPI's 12.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
WTPI
WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
12.05%13.18%11.99%8.94%3.27%0.00%1.43%1.47%6.46%3.52%2.27%
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
13.57%13.94%23.65%4.90%6.43%7.40%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLG and WTPI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYLG has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to WTPI (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLG dropped -21.30% vs WTPI's -28.40%.

On 5-year performance, XYLG leads with 10.41% vs 9.62% for WTPI. On fees, XYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, WTPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XYLG has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 9.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for WTPI.

XYLG has the higher dividend yield at 13.57%, compared with 12.05% for WTPI.

XYLG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index, while WTPI tracks Volos U.S. Large Cap Target 2.5% PutWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XYLG and 0.44% for WTPI.

XYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLG and WTPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer