XYLG vs. ULTI
XYLG (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and ULTI (REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XYLG is passively managed, while ULTI is actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XYLG charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for ULTI.
Performance
XYLG vs. ULTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than ULTI's 47.97% return.
XYLG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- —
ULTI
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 19.14%
- YTD
- 47.97%
- 6M
- 30.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLG vs. ULTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 8.26% | 2.02% |
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 47.97% | -38.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLG and ULTI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLG vs. ULTI — Risk / Return Rank
XYLG
ULTI
XYLG vs. ULTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF (ULTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLG | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.59 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLG | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | -0.24 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
XYLG vs. ULTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum ULTI drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and ULTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLG | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -41.74% | +20.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -8.71% | +8.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -28.24% | +24.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | — | — |
Volatility
XYLG vs. ULTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLG | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 62.51% | -53.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 62.51% | -48.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 62.51% | -48.64% |
XYLG vs. ULTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ULTI's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLG vs. ULTI - Dividend Comparison
XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.01%, less than ULTI's 41.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 41.23% | 14.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 13.01% | 13.94% | 23.65% | 4.90% | 6.43% | 7.40% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLG and ULTI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ULTI.
ULTI has the higher dividend yield at 41.23%, compared with 13.01% for XYLG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XYLG and 1.25% for ULTI.
Find the right allocation for XYLG and ULTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer