PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLG vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLG vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 49.19% return.


XYLG

1D
-1.11%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
6.31%
6M
5.87%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*

DTCR

1D
-3.02%
1M
3.31%
YTD
49.19%
6M
51.34%
1Y
73.85%
3Y*
35.46%
5Y*
14.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLG vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
6.31%12.93%22.31%18.16%-15.46%23.81%12.81%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
49.19%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLG and DTCR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.63

The correlation between XYLG and DTCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLG vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLG
XYLG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLG vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLGDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

5.76

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

17.72

-3.73

XYLG vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLG and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLG vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLGDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-38.98%

+17.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-12.89%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.42%

-24.96%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-38.98%

+17.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-3.02%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-12.28%

+8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

4.18%

-2.77%

Volatility

XYLG vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is 3.50%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that XYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLGDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

9.71%

-6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

18.51%

-10.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

23.26%

-13.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

22.15%

-8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

22.10%

-8.24%

XYLG vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLG vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.25%, more than DTCR's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.74%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
13.25%13.94%23.65%4.90%6.43%7.40%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLG and DTCR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTCR has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to XYLG (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLG dropped -21.30% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 14.82% vs 10.07% for XYLG. On fees, XYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XYLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 14.82% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTCR.

XYLG has the higher dividend yield at 13.25%, compared with 0.74% for DTCR.

XYLG is categorized as Derivative Income, while DTCR is REIT. XYLG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XYLG and 0.50% for DTCR.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLG and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer