XYLG vs. DBO
XYLG (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLG is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XYLG returned 10.07%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for DBO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYLG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
XYLG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 50.16% return.
XYLG
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 19.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -18.58%
- YTD
- 50.16%
- 6M
- 47.74%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
XYLG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 6.31% | 12.93% | 22.31% | 18.16% | -15.46% | 23.81% | 12.13% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 50.16% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 14.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLG and DBO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2020 | 0.09 |
The correlation between XYLG and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
XYLG
DBO
XYLG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYLG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.19 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.58 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.98 | 4.29 | +9.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYLG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -90.18% | +68.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -23.03% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.42% | -28.20% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -37.68% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -60.48% | +58.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -62.22% | +58.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 8.51% | -7.10% |
Volatility
XYLG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is 3.50%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that XYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 10.29% | -6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 29.36% | -21.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.95% | 34.89% | -24.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 32.54% | -18.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 31.81% | -17.95% |
XYLG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.25%, more than DBO's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.34% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 13.25% | 13.94% | 23.65% | 4.90% | 6.43% | 7.40% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLG and DBO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to XYLG (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLG dropped -21.30% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 10.16% vs 10.07% for XYLG. On fees, XYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XYLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
XYLG has the higher dividend yield at 13.25%, compared with 2.34% for DBO.
XYLG is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. XYLG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XYLG and 0.78% for DBO.
XYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYLG and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer