XYLG vs. ARMW
XYLG (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XYLG is passively managed, while ARMW is actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XYLG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
XYLG vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 133.71% return.
XYLG
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 21.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.56%
ARMW
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -28.93%
- 6M
- 143.26%
- YTD
- 133.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.40M | $4.54M | $4.17M | |
| $324.88K | $371.22K | $506.01K |
XYLG vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 10.03% | 3.59% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 133.71% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLG and ARMW is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.53 |
XYLG vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XYLG
ARMW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XYLG
ARMW
Financial Services
XYLG
ARMW
-
Communication Services
XYLG
ARMW
-
Healthcare
XYLG
ARMW
-
Consumer Cyclical
XYLG
ARMW
-
Industrials
XYLG
ARMW
-
Consumer Defensive
XYLG
ARMW
-
Energy
XYLG
ARMW
-
Utilities
XYLG
ARMW
-
Real Estate
XYLG
ARMW
-
Basic Materials
XYLG
ARMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLG vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
XYLG
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XYLG vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYLG | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYLG vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLG | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -56.50% | +35.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.96% | +52.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -27.31% | +23.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | — | — |
Volatility
XYLG vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLG | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 95.78% | -85.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 95.78% | -81.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 95.78% | -81.99% |
XYLG vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLG vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.98%, less than ARMW's 66.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 66.19% | 16.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 12.98% | 13.94% | 23.65% | 4.90% | 6.43% | 7.40% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLG and ARMW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 66.19%, compared with 12.98% for XYLG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XYLG and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for XYLG and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer