PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYL vs. MSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XYL vs. MSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xylem Inc. (XYL) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYL achieves a -18.57% return, which is significantly lower than MSI's 7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, XYL has underperformed MSI with an annualized return of 10.54%, while MSI has yielded a comparatively higher 21.65% annualized return.


XYL

1D
0.94%
1M
1.38%
YTD
-18.57%
6M
-19.12%
1Y
-12.41%
3Y*
1.00%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
10.54%

MSI

1D
0.46%
1M
3.61%
YTD
7.83%
6M
13.71%
1Y
0.89%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
15.56%
10Y*
21.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYL vs. MSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYL
Xylem Inc.
-18.57%18.78%2.57%4.77%-6.60%18.94%30.90%19.59%-1.01%39.50%
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
7.83%-16.17%49.12%23.04%-3.81%61.90%7.35%42.19%29.64%11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XYL and MSI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between XYL and MSI has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XYL:

$26.79B

MSI:

$69.26B

EPS

XYL:

$4.02

MSI:

$12.42

PE Ratio

XYL:

27.36

MSI:

33.20

PEG Ratio

XYL:

1.72

MSI:

2.03

PS Ratio

XYL:

3.85

MSI:

5.85

PB Ratio

XYL:

2.44

MSI:

27.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

XYL:

$6.97B

MSI:

$11.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XYL:

$2.71B

MSI:

$5.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

XYL:

$1.41B

MSI:

$3.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYL vs. MSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYL
XYL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MSI
MSI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYL vs. MSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xylem Inc. (XYL) and Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLMSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.03

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

0.04

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

0.07

-0.99

XYL vs. MSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYL Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the MSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYL and MSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYL vs. MSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYL drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, smaller than the maximum MSI drawdown of -93.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYL and MSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLMSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-93.60%

+46.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.04%

-25.45%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.04%

-27.01%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.69%

-27.23%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.69%

-32.81%

-13.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.30%

-17.00%

-10.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-40.70%

+30.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.54%

13.22%

+0.32%

Volatility

XYL vs. MSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xylem Inc. (XYL) is 6.01%, while Motorola Solutions, Inc. (MSI) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that XYL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLMSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

7.28%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.34%

19.70%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.52%

23.76%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.08%

23.06%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.30%

25.15%

+2.15%

Dividends

XYL vs. MSI - Dividend Comparison

XYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than MSI's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSI
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.12%1.17%0.87%1.16%1.26%1.07%1.55%1.46%1.85%2.14%2.05%2.09%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
1.51%1.17%1.24%1.15%1.09%0.93%1.02%1.22%1.26%1.06%1.25%1.54%

Financials

XYL vs. MSI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xylem Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B202220232024202520260
2.71B
(XYL) Total Revenue
(MSI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


XYL and MSI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSI has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to XYL (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYL dropped -46.69% vs MSI's -93.60%.

MSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYL and MSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer