PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF Inc (XY7D.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XY7D.DE is traded in EUR, while ESEA.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ESEA.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XY7D.DE achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than ESEA.DE's 11.31% return.


XY7D.DE

1D
-1.05%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.40%
6M
4.97%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESEA.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.20%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.29%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XY7D.DE
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF Inc
4.40%-5.34%25.87%-8.30%
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.31%4.18%32.44%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XY7D.DE and ESEA.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023

0.62

The correlation between XY7D.DE and ESEA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XY7D.DE
XY7D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XY7D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XY7D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XY7D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XY7D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XY7D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ESEA.DE
ESEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF Inc (XY7D.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XY7D.DEESEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.53

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

12.07

-3.44

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XY7D.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the ESEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XY7D.DE and ESEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XY7D.DEESEA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.04

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.88

-0.53

Drawdowns

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XY7D.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.79%, smaller than the maximum ESEA.DE drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XY7D.DE and ESEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XY7D.DEESEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.79%

-33.64%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.87%

-7.19%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-0.41%

-4.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-4.87%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.10%

-0.71%

Volatility

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF Inc (XY7D.DE) is 1.97%, while BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESEA.DE) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that XY7D.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XY7D.DEESEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

3.03%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.20%

8.65%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

12.45%

-3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.51%

15.91%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.51%

17.81%

-4.30%

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XY7D.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ESEA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XY7D.DE vs. ESEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

XY7D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than ESEA.DE's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ESEA.DE
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF
1.06%0.76%0.65%0.00%1.08%0.64%0.67%
XY7D.DE
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF Inc
6.70%9.21%7.75%4.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XY7D.DE and ESEA.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESEA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XY7D.DE.

XY7D.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT, while ESEA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XY7D.DE and 0.15% for ESEA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XY7D.DE and ESEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer